Search This Blog

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

A Doll for Mom

My mother came to me in a dream, but she had something real to say. Both she and my father had passed away a few years earlier. Apparently, in my conversations, I would talk forever about my Dad - a firefighter, my scoutmaster, my sister's Sunday School teacher, etc.

"Buddy," she said in this dream, "all I hear is 'my father this' and 'my father that'. Well, I had a hand in raising you too! Who sat with you when you had all those broken bones? Who helped you with your homework? Who was your Cub Scout den mother? Who got you dressed for church on Sunday mornings and school days the rest of the week? Didn't I play a role in your upbringing?" Well, she was right. I was embarrassed and apologetic. She had done all that while working a difficult nursing career and helping lots of others in the family, church and neighborhood. At only 4'6" at her tallest, nevertheless she was a powerhouse. I wouldn't have had as satisfying a life had it not been for my mother's tireless care.
 
Years later I bought her a porcelain flamenco doll while in Spain. (She had a large doll collection.) My friends laughed at me because she was, well, no longer living. "Just because she's dead doesn't mean I can't buy her a doll," I said defensively. Mom came to me in another dream that night too. She wanted to thank me for the doll, tell me she loved it, and reassure me that the journey home would go smoothly. It did.
 
We never outgrow our parents; they leave us all too soon. Sometimes memories are all we have. I have many wonderful memories, but we (mom and I) also have that doll!

© Gilbert Friend-Jones

Friday, April 30, 2021

Ancestors

Camp Ihduhopi, Loretto, MN
It rained all weekend. We gathered in the lodge for our annual retreat. A large fire crackled in the massive fireplace. We had been instructed to bring photographs or other objects from at least one of our ancestors, people who had gone before us and helped shape who we are. 

Our leader met us at the door. Lakota by birth, for years she helped deepen our understanding of our place in the universe. Now she asked us to put our chairs in a circle and place the photographs and memorabilia of our ancestors behind us around the circle. We never formally introduced these ancestors, yet they became a real presence through the weekend. We came to realize that we live always in their presence; they are with us even now.

While we were conducting the business of the church, a large spider lowered herself from the ceiling. “Ah!” Wilma said. “One of our relatives has come to visit.” With that, she began to help us understand how we exist in a living biosphere of interdependent life forms. Two-legged, four-legged, eight-legged, no-legged, thousand-legged - each has a niche, a sacred place. Trees too, and birds and fish. share this web of life. The massive outcroppings of rock rising from deep within the earth have stories to tell. We are relatives. We must live and make decisions that are respectful of all these relatives.

This was a planning retreat. She wanted us to see that every decision affects our children and their children, but also the progeny of all our planetary relatives. She encouraged us to consult our ancestors when we were uncertain.

She talked of spirit guides and the Great Spirit - whom she called Grandfather and, sometimes, Wakan Tanka. She spoke of the Medicine Wheel and gifts that proceed from its sacred directions.

That was many years ago. But as we move through Covid, police violence, and our polarized political landscape, as we witness now and anticipate more devastation wrought by climate change, I often return to that rainy weekend and roaring fire, that descending spider and sacred circle. We were friends and ancestors sitting together. We were not alone. We never are. I want to live in such a way that I honor our ancestors, care for our relatives, and prepare a brighter future for our children.

© Gilbert Friend-Jones
From: Faith in a Minor Key

Saturday, April 24, 2021

Homily or Sermon?

In recent months I have found myself wanting to substitute the word “homily” for “sermon” in our Sunday orders of worship. “This is curious,” I said to myself. “What is this about?”

At first, I suspected my desire to appear more southern than I have a right to claim to be. Homily. Hominy. Homily. Hominy. Homily.  Hominy. This word association evokes all things truly southern. The very sound of it suggests a languid, non-pretentious, warm morning, southern repast. Perhaps I will even develop a drawl.

“Hominy” derives from the Algonquin term for grain; it never occurs alone. What is its partner? “Grits.” True grits. Real Southerners spot us interlopers a mile away: 

"Sir, what would you like for breakfast?" 

“I’ll have a grit.”


“A grit? I’m sorry, sir. They never come alone.”

I think a good sermon ought to be a little “gritty”, don’t you? Grits on your plate keep you humble. The best upscale sermons ever savored still have some down-home common sense about them.

But I don’t think this is it. My Catholic friends point out that they “do” homilies while Protestants “do” sermons. So maybe there’s a wannabe priest lurking in my robe. But while I confess to being an ecu-maniac, and believe with every fiber of my being that we should work that “all may be one”, I have no desire to exchange the riotous freedoms of my tradition for the particular restrictions of another.

I asked my erudite colleagues to tell me the difference between a homily and a sermon. No one seems to know. I asked you who sit through them. “Homilies are shorter,” you say. With all due respect, I think you beg the question. Certainly my homilies are not shorter. (“Pastor,” pleaded one member, “your words don’t have to be eternal in order for them to be immortal.”)

Finally I looked in the dictionary. Homily is rooted in the Greek homi-letikos, meaning "conversation." Sermon comes directly from medieval Latin for "speech", and that probably derives from serere, “to link together or string together” like beads on a necklace. While both words carry the meaning of “a religious discourse before a congregation,” the nuance of homily is “an informal exposition usually of Scripture.” Sermon carries the additional shade of “an annoying harangue”.

I am allergic by temperament to harangues. I cherish dialogue. I like the thought that what I say from the pulpit is one piece of a much longer conversation that has been going on for centuries.

So as I prepare for our worship, perhaps I  am asking myself this question: “What shall it be this Sunday? An informal exposition, or an annoying harangue? A speech, or a searching  conversation?”

© Gilbert Friend-Jones, in Faith in a Minor Key. 

Saturday, March 20, 2021

Sacred Clutter


 Our neighborhood had a garage sale today, the first in its history. It lasted three hours and was closed to the public. Most of the neighbors skipped it too. No traffic. No customers. No sales. It was a real bust. 

On the other hand, it prompted Gretchen and me to get off our butts and make decisions about all the stuff we brought with us to Florida. Well, some of the stuff, anyway. We barely made a dent in this Herculean task. I still have the 1946 Lionel train my dad bought me when I was eleven months old, and all the post-war cardboard houses  – “made in Japan” – that we bought to go with it. There is my Little League uniform with “Little Buddy Jones” imprinted on the back, the glove for a small hand, and a miniature bat. There’s my merit badge sash and a whole lot of other Boy Scout paraphernalia, including my Dad’s badge when he was a scout in the 1930s. I have cars, guns and planes that I played with as a child. I even have the toy chest I kept my things in – so small by today’s standards. 

All my elementary school artwork, my 10th grade biology notebooks, and many of the papers I wrote are well preserved.  We have quilts by my grandmother and paintings by my wife. We have a pie safe and antique chairs - my Dad’s handwork - that we’ll never use again. Add to this the hundreds of letters, newspaper clippings and magazines my mother treasured. Don’t forget the boxes of Christmas ornaments, the family heirlooms, and all the photos Gretchen spent hours organizing and digitalizing. Did I mention my father’s coin and postcard collections? My own Easter egg collection? My elephant collection? My icons? My CDs? My books?

Until our neighbors announced this sale, I couldn’t bear to part with any of it. Then something snapped. Now I want it all to go away! If I spent the first 75 years of my life collecting this stuff, I'll be spending the next 75 finding it good homes.

But Florida is a terrible place to do this. At least 75% of the people here are in the same boat. They don’t want to pick through the flotsam and jetsam of someone else’s life. I have enough stuff for a small museum, but no one really wants to visit it. These objects are sacred to me, but they lack meaning or significance to everyone else. 

The Bible says that the sins of the fathers (and mothers) are visited upon their children until the umpteenth generation. I’m going to do my best to prevent the fulfillment of this curse, but what a daunting task it is. 


(Photo by Andrew Evers, CNBC, Ocrober 1, 2017)

Tuesday, January 5, 2021

Do not go gentle...

"All relationships lead toward separation."
- Clark Moustakas (Loneliness)


I was pondering the sermon I soon would deliver when I found myself drifting into a reverie of the snow sculpted landscape outside my window. The winds were picking up. Tree branches were encased in ice. They were bending and swaying, dancing in mysterious synchronicity. 

I noticed a single oak leaf attached to a branch high in a tree. It was being blown fiercely in every direction. On no other branch, on no other tree, did I see a leaf. This one was dry, shriveled and encrusted in ice. It refused to fall to the blanketed earth below. The winds attacked it ferociously. 

I wondered: Was the leaf tenaciously clinging to the tree? Or was the tree refusing to let it go? Did the leaf fear the fall, or was the tree holding on to this last vestige of warmer, greener times? Was it mutual? Were they clinging to each other out of their separate needs? Were they desperately defying the inevitable separation?

I continued to watch. Is this not what most of our struggles are about? I admired their pluck, but I felt a sadness too - a tree and its leaf against the universe's inexorable demand to let go. 

© Gilbert Friend-Jones
From: Faith in a Minor Key

Wednesday, November 25, 2020

The Silence of Massasoit


Four hundred years ago the Mayflower and Speedwell set sail from the port of Plymouth, England. The Speedwell turned back, but the Mayflower came to rest in an area of New England known as Patuxet. The ship carried 102 passengers, most of whom William Bradford called “Pilgrims”, and about 30 crew members. This was a seminal moment in the history of our country for many reasons.

Much of what we experience today was present at Plimoth – our desperate hunger for liberty, our courageous willingness to sacrifice everything for it, our yearning for a church and community governed by and for the people, and, sadly, our deeply destructive if often unconscious convictions of white supremacy.

The year was 1620. The Pilgrims, our direct spiritual ancestors, were fleeing religious persecution. They had rejected creeds, hierarchies, and coercive religion. They believed there always is “more truth” to be discovered by faithful people. They embraced covenanting as the proper way to organize - first a church, and then a civil society.

Years earlier they had established an underground congregation in Nottinghamshire, England. They had transported it to Leyden, Holland. Finally, they brought it to what is now Massachusetts. The local church they established continues to worship and serve to this day. It is known as the First Parish in Plymouth – a Unitarian Universalist congregation.

It is right and fitting that we reflect on that historic moment. To do so I will share several vignettes, all related, in which we can judge for ourselves the changing appraisals of our heritage.

Vignette One:

In the late 1970s, in a large downtown church in Minneapolis, nearly 50 women formed a highly talented group called “The Needlers”. A section of the church building was set aside as “The Stitchery”. “Needlers” had to take classes and pass an exam before they could work on a large embroidery. Over a period of more than three years, they created a massive embroidery, 16’tall by 25’ wide, designed by the British artist, Pauline Baynes. It became the centerpiece of the church’s newly renovated Guild Hall. At the center of this embroidery is the scene of “The First Thanksgiving” at Plimoth Plantation in Massachusetts.

Years passed. The Needlers stitched new embroideries and fiber art. Today their creations are a “must see” stop on every city tour. There are now four large embroideries and many smaller ones, but the original “First Thanksgiving” remains the defining piece of the whole endeavor.

Except it isn’t.

A year ago this month, in a contentious congregational meeting, after months of study and conversation, the members voted 372 to 189 to retire their beloved embroidery indefinitely.

Why?

The Thanksgiving meal depicted in this embroidery is viewed by most Native Americans as a stereotypical and sanitized version of the real story. For American Indians, it points to a bitter history of conquest and betrayal. After many years, the church finally heard the justified grievances of their indigenous neighbors. They listened to the deep pain this embroidery both depicted and inflicted. In a costly gesture of repentance and reconciliation, they removed it.

Vignette Two:

Fifty years ago, it was decided to celebrate the 350th anniversary of the Mayflower’s arrival with a huge festival at Plimoth Plantation, the “living history” museum in Massachusetts that replicates the original settlement of Pilgrims. A Wampanoag elder, Frank (Wamsutta) James, was invited by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to participate in the commemoration. He was expected to talk about the “friendly relations” between the Wampanoag Indians and the Pilgrims.

The speech he wrote was not entirely negative but, in real friendship, real truth must prevail. It recounted the years of betrayal, death and loss of land. When the text of Mr. James’s speech was reviewed by the planners sometime before the dinner, it was rejected. A new speech was written for him. He refused the substitution, and the organizers "disinvited" him from the celebration.

Frank James and other Wampanoag guests walked out. They walked up the hill to a statue of Massasoit. Massasoit was the Wampanoag leader who helped the exhausted settlers survive their first New England winter. Under his leadership, the Wampanoags taught the Pilgrims how to plant and fish in their new home.

Massasoit had strategic motives for welcoming the Pilgrims, no doubt, but he genuinely believed that Indians and Whites could find a way to live together in peace. The Wampanoag are the Indians depicted in “The First Thanksgiving” by Pauline Baynes and celebrated in the Plymouth Church embroidery.

When the pilgrims arrived, they did not “discover” a vast and empty wilderness inhabited only by untamed savages. The Wampanoag were just one group that had lived on this land for more than 12,000 years. Known as “The People of the First Light”, they were part of a civilization that had existed for centuries. Many tribes and nations had created a complex web of relationships with its own economy, laws, culture, art, sports, and spirituality.

A full century before the Pilgrims landed at Patuxet, other Europeans had explored and traded with indigenous peoples in the area. They also had robbed them, imported lethal diseases and took native people as slaves.

The indigenous economic and social networks that had lasted for centuries had been strained to the breaking point by these marauders. The years 1613 to 1619 were especially harsh. They are known to this day as “The Great Dying”. Whole villages succumbed. Over time, the Wampanoag had been reduced from as many as 40,000 people to as few as 400. They needed peace more than conflict, and allies more than enemies.

This was the context in which Massasoit rose to leadership. His wisdom had been forged in the cauldron of suffering that preceded the Mayflower’s arrival. He had seen the benefits and destruction left by these European explorations, yet he still believed in co-existence.

The brave and hardy Pilgrims also had lost more than half their company that first year. We honor them for their ideals, and for their courage and sacrifice. Yet sadly, they contributed another stream to American culture: a 17th Century version of white supremacy.

The Pilgrims were certain that they were destined to occupy this land. They believed that they were superior to the people they encountered here. Governor William Bradford even attributed the plagues and hardships the Indians had so recently endured to what he called “the good hand of God,” who, he said, “favored our beginnings” by “sweeping away great multitudes of the natives...that He (God) might make room for us.”

More than 50 of the first colonial villages were located where Indian communities had been emptied by disease. The epidemic, another settler wrote, left the land “without any [people] to disturb or appease our free and peaceable possession thereof, from whence we may justly conclude, that God made the way to effect His work.”

Was this the beginning of “manifest” destiny? Did White Anglo-Saxon Protestant privilege arrive with the Bibles and blunderbusses?

Sadly, these two peoples – Indian and European - never saw beyond their own needs and alliances, never really saw and heard the humanity of each other.

Yes, there was a harvest celebration. The Plymouth Needlers were right about that.

Yes, Massasoit came, accompanied by 90 of his compatriots. They outnumbered the surviving Pilgrims, two-to-one.

Yes, the Pilgrims shared an abundant harvest with their guests, and yes, the Indians brought wild game to the party.

Massasoit had a vision of peoples living together in peace. Yet only a generation later, children who played together at this feast were at war to the death with one another. The massive influx of European colonists led to a war of expansion that became a war of survival for the indigenous peoples. Historians tell us that "King Philip's War" as it was called was the bloodiest conflict ever to have been waged on American soil. Hundreds of colonists died. Dozens of English settlements were destroyed. Thousands of Indians were killed, wounded, or captured and sold into slavery. Their ancient civilization was shattered.

350 years later, now standing by the statue of Massasoit, Frank Wamsutta James could see a replica of the Mayflower bobbing calmly in Plymouth Harbor. He and his audience overlooked the very land where this tragedy descended upon their ancestors. With the Psalmist they may have thought, “a thousand years in Thy sight are but as yesterday, when it is past.” 

There he delivered his speech. Ever since that time - fifty years ago - many native people across the continent have observed Thanksgiving Day as their Annual Day of Mourning.

Vignette Three:

Fast forward to the “Covided” year of 2020. It is now the 400th anniversary of the sailing of the Mayflower from the small town of Plymouth in England to the icy New England shores. A replica of the Mayflower again would sail. The drama of those first years would be re-enacted. But this time the people planning the commemoration included descendants of the original Wampanoag in the research, planning, and retelling of the stories. It would be a multi-cultural narrative commemorating – not celebrating – what was gained and what was lost.

More than 30 Wampanoag Indians have become collaborators in the project known as Mayflower 400. They have created art exhibitions and demonstrations. They are teaching classes in both England and America about their culture, customs, and history. With their English counterparts at The Box Theatre in Plymouth, England, they have written a historical drama and prepared to take their parts in it. Covid has prevented this collaboration from coming to fruition, but in time both Indians and Whites will tell their story together. Meanwhile, they have generated a lot of material online. The Wampanoag, at last, are being heard.

Let's listen to a few words from the speech Frank Wamsutta James was forbidden to give 50 years ago, but which he gave anyway before the regal statue of Massasoit.

“High on a hill, overlooking the famed Plymouth Rock, stands (this) statue of our great Sachem, Massasoit. Massasoit has stood many years in silence. We the descendants of this great Sachem have been a silent people. The necessity of making a living in this materialistic society of the white man caused us to be silent. Today, I and many of my people are choosing to face the truth…

“Two distinctly different cultures met. One thought they must control life; the other believed life was to be enjoyed because nature decreed it. Let us remember, the Indian is and was just as human as the White man (and woman). The Indian feels pain, gets hurt, and becomes defensive, has dreams, bears tragedy and failure, suffers from loneliness, needs to cry as well as laugh. (The Indian), too, is often misunderstood….

“What has happened cannot be changed, but today we must work towards a more humane America, a more Indian America, where men, (women) and nature once again are important; where the Indian values of honor, truth, and brotherhood prevail. You (who are White) are celebrating an anniversary. We the Wampanoags will help you celebrate the concept of a beginning. It was the beginning of a new life for the Pilgrims. Now, 350 years later, it is the beginning of a new determination for the original American: the American Indian.”

Frank James would be pleased to know that during this 400th anniversary year, 2020, the living museum, previously known as Plimoth Plantation for 73 years, has a new name. From henceforth it will be called Plimoth-Patuxet.

He would be glad to know that Minneapolis changed the name of its largest lake from Lake Calhoun to its original name, Bde Maka Ska.

He would be glad to know that six Native Americans will serve in the next US Congress. Many barriers are falling.

We have a long, long way to go. Yet we must dream. Someday, perhaps, Plymouth Church’s original embroidery can be resurrected – not as a distorted vision of the past, but as a dream of what may yet be. But not yet.

May this Covided year be for us the beginning of the end of very old assumptions of white supremacy. May 2020 be the beginning of a new way of listening, celebrating and inclusion. May we all find a place at the table together.

 



Friday, September 25, 2020

A (Notorious) Woman of Valor




Tzedek, tzedek, tirdof

"Justice, justice, shall you pursue.” 

Celia Amster Bader was the first American-born child in a family of Austrian Jewish immigrants. She was born just four months after her mother arrived on these shores. Her daughter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg (RBG), often noted that her mother was “conceived in the Old World and born in the New”.

An Orthodox Jew, Celia kept a list of “women of valor” — Biblical women who impacted the world for the better, women such as Sarah, Deborah, Miriam, etc. RBG memorized their stories. Celia expected “valor” and excellence in her daughter too, and RBG received a first-class, yeshiva-worthy education. "My mother told me to be a lady," said RBG. For her, that meant to be your own person. Be independent." 

When RBG entered high school, her mother was diagnosed with cancer. She died just two days before Ruth’s graduation - an eerie foreshadowing of the timing of RGH’s own battle with terminal cancer. “When my mother died,” RBG commented, “the house was filled with women, but only men could participate in the minyan….” Because she was a girl, she was not permitted to recite Kaddish -- the traditional Jewish mourners’ prayer. She was indignant; she felt it was an affront to her mother. “That time was not a good one for me in terms of organized religion,” she recalled. 

Yet a gold mezuzah hung on the doorframe of her office, given by a yeshiva in Brooklyn. She was enormously generous to Jewish causes. A framed lithograph of the Hebrew command, “Tzedek, tzedek, tirdof — Justice, justice, shall you pursue” Deuteronomy 16:20) also hung in her office. The exceptional rarity of a repeated word in the Torah gives these words added significance.

Even the collar (jabot) she wore for the court’s opening session had a special Hebrew inscription. Woven in silk by the Jewish artist Marcy Epstein, it reads along its edge, “Tzedek, Tzedek,” evoking “Tzedek, tzedek tirdof.”

In 2015, RBG was asked by the Jewish World Service to write for its Passover Haggadah. She chose texts about women and the roles women played in the Exodus narrative. She included the Pharaoh’s daughter, Moses' sister Miriam, the midwives, Shifra and Puah, and others.

There were many non-Biblical “women of valor” on RBG’s list. Eleanor Roosevelt was one; another was Emma Lazarus. The latter's poem, ‘The New Colossus,’ is etched on the base of the Statue of Liberty. That poem has welcomed legions of immigrants, RBG commented, including her own family — “people seeking shelter from fear, and people longing to find freedom from intolerance.”

I’m sure her own mother was on that list. RBG once asked, rhetorically, what is the difference between a bookkeeper in New York City’s garment district and a Supreme Court Justice? “One generation,” she said. “My own life bears witness to the differences of opportunities available to my mother and those afforded me.” Many opportunities were available to her because her mother struggled and sacrificed to make them possible.

A young Jewish woman wrote that RBG, “…represented the country we wanted to believe we were in. She overcame misogyny, patriarchy, and antisemitism to be the first Jewish woman to sit on the Supreme Court. She fought for us and for so many people, for a more equitable and just America. She did it while having a marriage and children. She became a holy talisman… (She is) a holy reminder of what this country could be and of what we can achieve...”[i]

To me, Ruth Bader Ginsburg is an exemplar of American patriotism. She embodied the best of our country. She is the most complete and compelling example of what it means to be a human being. 

Celia Amster Bader, you must be very proud. Thank you. 

by Gilbert Friend-Jones
[i] Carly Pildis, “May her memory be a revolution: We are all notorious now”, in The Forward, September 19, 2020.