By Budd Friend-Jones
In Syria, Americans seemed to be facing an untenable choice: to keep or to abandon our role to protect a vulnerable minority and maintain a tenuous peace and, in a larger sense, to be or not to be the world's policeman. It didn't have to be this way.
In Syria, Americans seemed to be facing an untenable choice: to keep or to abandon our role to protect a vulnerable minority and maintain a tenuous peace and, in a larger sense, to be or not to be the world's policeman. It didn't have to be this way.

The failure to utilize the United Nations cannot be laid at the feet of the USA alone. It reflects a widespread ethos of turning away from the costs and challenges of "globalism". Precisely when we most need robust international institutions, they are being weakened by emergent nationalisms, ethnic chauvinism and an ideological commitment to dismantle many of the traditional functions of governments, including collective trade and security arrangements.

As we deal with planetary issues such as climate change, and the challenges of intractable conflicts such as Syria, we need to revision and revitalize international agencies such as the United Nations for new and larger roles. We should require all candidates for Federal office to tell us how they will do just this,
©Gilbert R. Friend-Jones
buddfj@gmail.com